You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #103: I never said I thought any laws were suspended, bolo.. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #98
103. I never said I thought any laws were suspended, bolo..
AZCat made the claim that "the same laws of physics apply to both scenarios" regarding the plane impact(total disintegration/atomization) with a solid concrete wall in the video as they do with the plane that hit the tower(total penetration).

All I asked was "which laws of physics apply to both scenarios?"... and I asked because I DON'T KNOW, but want to understand. It seems AZCat cannot provide an answer.... unless you consider "I can grab a dime from a jar and flip it in the air, then do the same with a penny" to be an answer. To me, that looks like he's just trying to say "what goes up, must come down",... and that has absolutely NO relevance to this conversation, right?

As I have stated before, I am NOT a physics major, just so we have that out of the way again. You see, what I'm looking at is like this: the video of the test plane represents "irresistible force meets immovable object", the plane hitting the towers represents "mass in motion following the path of least resistance" and Mr AZCat wants to toss coins in the air to explain "what goes up, must come down"...

Maybe you can help clear this up for me? Please keep in mind, I'm talking about the impacts themselves, NOT whether the planes crumpled, deformed or broke apart. I can fully understand the point of the video, showing that a plane hitting a solid object didn't deform, crumple or break apart upon impact, so therefore *that* law should still be in effect with a much larger, much heavier plane hitting a structure that isn't solid...

During the impact in the test plane video, we see the plane totally disintegrating, but we also see concrete dust and disintegrated debris flying up in the air. The impact of the plane into the tower shows the plane totally penetrating, yet NO flying glass of debris until AFTER total penetration and the fireball explodes back out.

Again... what same laws of physics apply to both of these impacts?

Thanks in advance, bolo... I have to run to the store now, so I'll check for your answer when I get back. I know we haven't always agreed in the past, but as I've said before.. I have given you your props a few times, and you do at least TRY to give intelligent answers to get someone to see things from your point of view...

PEACE!

Ghost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC