Reply #78: Confusing the issues

[Stephanie]

I can accept that the bush* admin did many, many things wrong before, during and after 9/11, without accepting what to me is a completely illogical conclusion that the building came down by controlled demolition.

Not believing your CD theory does not exclude the other wrongdoing, that the bush* admin had many warnings, knew there would be hijackings, knew that planes might be used as weapons, expected this and got out of DC for their own personal safety, while issuing no warnings and taking no action to save the lives of others, because a terrorist act on American soil would jumpstart their PNACkian agenda of colonizing the ME.

I can believe all of that, but I can't believe there were any explosives in those buildings, one, because the security in those buildings was intense, two, because it would be IMO impossible to plant explosives w/o detection, three, because thousands of eyewitnesses at the site that day did not SEE any explosions, four, because no evidence of explosives was discovered in the aftermath, five, because explosives were not necessary to bring those buildings down. There were thousands of people all over that site before, during, and after. It's not possible to hide this, IMO. That's why I don't believe it.

Is BushCO at fault? Yes. Did they let it happen on purpose? I think so. Have they done everything in their power to stymie investigations in order to hide their culpability? Obviously. But I can separate those issues. Accepting that they LIHOP does not compel me to accept the theory of CD. Please don't confuse the issues.