You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MIHOP theories: an overview [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
Woody Box Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 06:03 PM
Original message
MIHOP theories: an overview
Advertisements [?]
There is a lot of discussion going on within the MIHOP faction of the 9/11 movement. This is an absolutely necessary step for the evolution of the truth and nothing to worry about if everyone shows respect to each other.

This post is meant to clarify the standpoint of the different MIHOP positions. Dear LIHOPpers and Bush/Cheney Scenario advocates, PLEASE, don't disturb the thread by declaring crazy all MIHOPpers. If you don't like MIHOP and have nothing to contribute, PLEASE stay out of the thread.

The MIHOP theories can be subdivided in three categories:

1) The four-planers: This group thinks that the planes that hit the WTC and pentagon were the same planes as the ones that left their respective airport (according to the official story). The control of the planes was taken over by a remote-controlled system during the flight. The pilots - the original pilots or the hijackers - had no chance to influence the flight path.

Websites (not claiming to be complete): 911.review.com, oilempire.us, medienanalyse-international.de

2) The no-planers: They say that the planes hitting the WTC were just video or holographic artifacts. Instead, some high-tech military devices were used. No planes departed in Boston, Washington or Newark, and the flight pathes are complete bogus.

Websites: thewebfairy.com, 911hoax.com

3) The multi-planers: They promote a kind of plane swap. The planes started at their respective airports, but were replaced by unmanned remote controlled planes during the flight. These objects were then driven into the WTC (pentagon) while the original planes went down somewhere at a hidden place.

Websites: physics911.org, letsroll911.org, serendipity.li

This is just a summary, without any assessment. If a member of one group thinks his standpoint is not reflected properly, feel free to add corrections.

Each theory has to go through the reality test when new evidence comes to the light. This, again, is an evolutionary process. Just one of these theories can be true.

You want to know what I am? I'm a multi planer, and I'm ready to defend my position. But not here and now, because this posting is just an overview.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC