You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #102: The columns are the whole issue [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
freedom fighter jh Donating Member (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
102. The columns are the whole issue
What happened to the columns?

The columns were holding up the buildings. Once the columns collapsed, the rest of the buildings had to collapse.

Just what happened to them? Did they simply buckle? If so they would have remained standing, each column in one piece. Did each column break into two pieces, each several hundred feet long? If so, they would have been visible after the collapse. After all, the towers measured only 200 feet on each side, so 94 pieces each 500 feet long would have stuck out from the rubble. Or did they break into much smaller pieces, or perhaps melt? It must have been one of these things, because these are the only possibilities left. The longest pieces of steel beams documented in the NIST report were about 40 feet long. I'm using that as a best guess for the longest pieces that were produced. It has to be a guess because, as you know, most of the steel was not left available for examination.

You are absolutely right to consider energy. What was the source of the energy that broke each of 47 massive steel columns into 30 pieces each? One would need a steel manual as well as specific knowledge about the columns to try to calculate that amount of energy. It would be equal to the force required to make each break in each column (or otherwise cause the column to break into pieces), times the distance through which that force would act, times the number of breaks per column, times 47, the number of columns. Remember that these columns were built strong enough so that together they could hold up a 110-story building, and they did that for a quarter of a century. Intuition tells me that that energy is many times the building's potential energy, the energy that was available in the fall. By my calcs, the buildings lost less than 20% of their potential energy in the fall. That 20% would have had to shatter the columns, pulverize the concrete, and accelerate the air to gusts.

Not plausible. Something that is not in the OCT destroyed the columns.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC