Reply #76: Sorry if i was curt

[mirandapriestly]

It was very interesting to see the different versions of this story that are around. Sometimes it is changed to make it less damning. Occasionally the part of the explosions while they are on the upper floor are missing. What makes it worth posting is that the lobby was "gone". There is really no other way to interpret that and I think Jennings is credible and he would have no reason to make it up or be mistaken. I have tried to locate him a little bit perhaps he still works for the city and I can email.
I think that the part about the explosion being from the impact of #2 is damage control and I don't think it came from Jennings, it is not in the original AP story. The larger the newspaper, I noticed, the more likely they are to edit that out (for example one of the large Boston paper's edits that out). To me it looks like the explosion resulted in the lobby being "bombed out", I think , but of course the wording is vague so it is hard to prove.
Then there is the Patricia Ondrovic interview (I received an email from her ) where she actually observed what she thought to be explosives in wtc7 & 5.