You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #20: But if they were temporary, then Israel must have considered that when [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
breakaleg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-16-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. But if they were temporary, then Israel must have considered that when
they built them - being illegal and all.

I know it will seem simplistic to you. But considering it's a violation of international law, it's doesn't seem right to allow Israel to benefit from its illegal activity. And driving such a solution down the throats of a people that already feel they've been done wrong, won't go far for peace. Assuming that's Israel's real goal. From what you describe, it seems more like a lust for land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC