Reply #7: What I posted was a story from the other POV.

[Wordie]

And since there are plenty of documented instances of Israeli authorities not acknowledging, or misrepresenting the facts of a variety of those sorts of incidents that don't make them look good, I guess I'll have to say it again: we don't know what happened.

And I think the appearance that you're seeing is something that exists as a result of the filter that is applied by some to any article about Israel that shows it in a less-than-perfect light. The filter appears frequently to bend the "truth" into something that I just don't recognize.

Because I posted this article from a different POV than yours doesn't necessarily mean I believe everything that it says, either. As I've said several times already, I think that BOTH sides disseminate propaganda. Yet you insist that the side of the story that you want to believe has the only possible "facts" of the matter, and that anything else can only be absurd.

Who is more likely to be disseminating and/or believing in propaganda? The person who says, "I don't think we can know what happened," or the person who jumps in and insists that we can only see it one way?