It sounds like this new book is more of the same. The Case For Israel had him arguing like he was defending Israel in a criminal trial, and I thought most of his arguments were flawed and all his efforts were focused on painting the Palestinians as the enemy, while Israel was the totally innocent victim. And all he did from what I remember was parrot the talking points clung to by the Israeli govt and US based 'supporters of Israel'. So just like with any sequel to an already uninspiring original, I'm not going to be putting 'The Case For Peace' on my shopping list...
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
