You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #16: Well no. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
aranthus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Well no.
First of all, from a practical standpoint, Israel already has all of Jerusalem, and obviously is in a stronger negotiating position. So if anyone needs to give on this issue it's the Palestinians. Second, Israel has a stronger moral claim to all of Jerusalem that the Palestinians. Among other reasons, Jerusalem has been a capital of a Jewish state in the past, and has never been the capital of a Palestinian state. Third, the Palestinian demand for all of Jerusalem sends a message to Israel that the Palestinians are not only uncompromising, but totally unrealistic, which is not a very good way to induce the Israelis to take them seriously as a peace partner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC