You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #48: The argument that "assault weapons" are more deadly than comparable non-"assault weapons" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #26
48. The argument that "assault weapons" are more deadly than comparable non-"assault weapons"
is indeed a falsehood.

Yes, any centerfire rifle is more lethal than a .22 rimfire. But a .22 centerfire with a black aluminum receiver and a protruding handgrip (AR-15) is NOT more lethal than a .22 centerfire with a stainless steel receiver and straight wooden stock (Ruger Mini-14, Remington 7615, etc.).

The difference between an "assault weapon" and a non-"assault weapon":

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC