It showed that you do not understand what is basic US law...that the police do not have a responsibility to protect individuals and that it is a general responsibility to the populace. The case you cited in Canada would not have gone the same way in the us.
The upshot of that is the individual has primary responsibility for their safety. Its one of the reasons that private firearms ownership for self defense is a good thing.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(898 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
