IF he had had a permit to tote his firearm around, he WOULD HAVE been a "law-abiding gun owner". He WOULD HAVE been LEGALLY carrying a firearm around.
I agree with your conditional speculation if you add one more caveat:
Carrying would have been legal only if he had not been drinking or using illegal drugs. And who with any life experience at all would believe that was the case in this incident? Sober, sane people don't pick fights at taco shops at 2:30 AM.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
