You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #93: From your link [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
rrneck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #86
93. From your link
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/nsb/tsc/tsc_faqs
The TSC cannot reveal whether a particular person is in the TSDB. The TSDB remains an effective tool in the government’s counterterrorism efforts because its contents are not disclosed. If TSC revealed who was in the TSDB, terrorist organizations would be able to circumvent the purpose of the terrorist watchlist by determining in advance which of their members are likely to be questioned or detained.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/nsb/tsc/tsc_redress

Because the contents of the consolidated terrorist watchlist are derived from classified and sensitive law enforcement and intelligence information, the TSC cannot confirm or deny whether an individual is on the watchlist.

The TSC does not accept redress inquiries directly from the public. Instead, members of the public should contact the relevant screening agency with their questions or concerns about screening. The screening agency is in the best position to identify and resolve issues related to that agency's screening process. Information on how to contact screening agencies is listed below.


They won't tell you if you are on the list. If they won't verify your presence on the list, how will you know who has your name to begin the redress process or even that your name on the list is the problem? Where is it written that they have to verify your presence on the list to any other governmental agency, and how long does that take? Does the inquiry itself constitute criteria for inclusion on the list? Who knows? It is a classic authoritarian catch-22. If you have "a problem" you have to address a separate government agency for each "problem". One's life can quickly become a morass of bureaucratic hell trying to secure a civil right that shouldn't have been denied in the first place. Simple denial of rights by governmental opacity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC