Reply #99: Yeah, that's an argument I've never understood either

[Euromutt]

With one breath, the prohibitionists state that "large-capacity" magazines and so-called "assault weapons" serve no other purpose than to mow down large numbers of innocents, then with the next, they propose an exemption for law enforcement (which has no legitimate need of such items), thereby acknowledging that their claims about "serving no other purpose than to mow down large numbers of innocents" is bullshit. Well, that or they have some very scary ideas about what law enforcement should be equipped to be able to do...