Reply #53: Read the Heller case, that settles your militia requirement.

[PavePusher]

Then you allude to the phallus substitution fallacy. For the fail.



"The chance of a bystander being harmed by those toting is probably greater than the chance of most toters really needing a gun (except, maybe, from a psychological/fear standpoint) when they are out in public."

Again, some evidence would help your assertion, but you know that there isn't any, so you just keep repeating yourself. Fail again.



Citizens carrying weapons legally, for legal self-defense, have a very good track record for safety. Unless your precognition is very much better than mine, and you can tell people exactly when and where they will need a weapon for self-defense, it is not your place to deny them a Civil Right.