You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU.
Reply #50: Not necessarilly.
[View All]
dairydog91
(520 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-21-09 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #45 |
|
Edited on Sun Jun-21-09 01:09 PM by dairydog91
But you are definitely leaning towards performing a Semantics Salsa.
Some popular outright falsehoods: 1. Gun companies deliberately sold guns designed to evade security (Ceramic or plastic guns). 2. "Regular" ammunition can't penetrate a cop's vest. Only armor-piercing ammunition can do this (And should be banned). 3. Normal rifles aren't in any way related to military designs. 4. "Hunting" rifles are low-powered and short-ranged; Also, they would never be caught up in a "sniper rifle" ban.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.