Reply #8: That's not what I got from that thread

[cprise]

The best pro-DDT argument was that SAND was also 'proven' to be carcinogenic. But sand does not accumulate in living tissue like DDT, nor does it prevent birds from producing offspring.

When you get rid of malaria, then you're up against other problems like hunger AND your environment is contaminated.

And there's still no answer to the distribution question.