Reply #4: Oh, over in the anti-nuke cults you have a way to deal with dangerous fossil fuel waste?

[NNadir]

I don't fucking think so.

In fact, you couldn't care less about what to do with dangerous fossil fuel waste.

People who do know what to do with so called "nuclear waste" can't get the attention of an ignorant and distracted public which prides itself on deliberate ignorance.

Nuclear power does not need to be perfect - neither technically nor in the stupid arena of public perception - to be better than everything else.

It merely needs to be better than everything else, and it is.

There is NOT ONE member of the anti-nuke fundie faith, NOT ONE, who can actually point to a person who has been injured by the storage of used nuclear fuel and there is NOT ONE member of said dogmatic fundie faith who gives a rat's ass about the 39,000 people estimated to have died from dangerous fossil fuel waste in Italy in 2004: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4283295.stm

There is NOT ONE, fundie anti-nuke who gives a rat's ass about electronic waste, I note either. If there was such a member of this cult, they wouldn't be here hawking solar cells. The main reason that no one notices dangerous solar cell waste, is that solar electricity is a trivial form of energy.

Of course, twenty years from now, when this bill begins to become due on a grander scale, the anti-nuke cult will still be uninformed, illiterate, and indifferent.

Oh, and thanks to the link for the IEER, another link in the vast circle jerk of self referential anti-nuke cult websites.

Maybe we should start posting links from fundie anti-evolution websites to "disprove" evolution.