You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #10: That is why unlike certain person who likes to call wind "toys"...
[View All]
Statistical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-23-10 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 10. That is why unlike certain person who likes to call wind "toys"... |
|
I realize we need wind/solar/hydro/efficiency improvements and sadly we likely need some CCS too (although it should be last resort).
The problem is too big to leave any cards on the table.
It is unlikely China will ever develop more than 30% nuclear power but it is equally likely China will develop 30%+ wind. However we may see 20%-25% of each = 40%-50% emission free power. Throw in 20% hydro, 5%-10% solar, and some CCS and you *could* see a low carbon (although unlikely carbon neutral) China.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread