You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: How about we call a source of dangerous particulate pollution? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. How about we call a source of dangerous particulate pollution?
Edited on Wed Mar-10-10 06:51 PM by NNadir
Would that work?

I can produce a paper, and I'm working on a post to discuss this in the context of the 65 million people who will die in China in the next 23 years from COPD, comparing the carcinogenicity of wood smoke and the carcinogenicity of um, cigarettes.

It will be a fun post I'm sure, but will not generate as much concern and heat as a harmless tritium atom in Vermont.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC