You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #146: Whatever. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #145
146. Whatever.
Edited on Sat Mar-12-05 04:59 PM by NNadir
Like I said, when your argument is weak, change the subject.

I am not discussing nuclear war, in which one seeks maximal distribution of radiation, but nuclear fuel and its management, where the goal is to contain and control nuclear materials created for constructive and peaceful use.

One of the mechanisms used by people who have an irrational and frankly dangerous fear of radiation and the promotion of irrational judgment resulting from that fear is to confuse the spectra of nuclear war with nuclear power. This is the equivalent of confusing a fear of napalm firebombs with gasoline. No one is calling for the banning of gasoline by appealing to arguments about Dresden or Tokyo or Hamburg or Hanoi although people feel perfectly free to call for the banning of safe clean nuclear reactors because of 60 year old events at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

If, however, one insists, that war and power must always be confused, I note that nuclear wars have not killed anyone in recent years, whereas fossil fuel wars and weapons manufactured from fossil fuels for use in war have been killing people almost continuously on this planet for as long as I can remember.

There is no mechanism whereby 18 billion curies of cesium from commercial nuclear power could escape all at once and be confined to an area between Boston and New York and no amount of irrelevant blather about nuclear war can make it so. Right now that material is widely distributed, and is contained in such a way as to prevent access only by elaborate means. I am merely stating that if all the ridiculous fantasies of people who know doodly squat about radiation and chemistry came true, and somehow all 18 billion curies of Cs-137 were to magically escape, it certainly would not be more dangerous as the collapse of earth's atmosphere. It would be very easy, btw, to dilute cesium to the same concentration of potassium in the sea. I don't advocate that because I don't pretend that diluted natural radiation as represented by K-40 is harmless simply because it naturally occurs and is dilute. But then again, I know what I'm talking about.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC