You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #3: I'd support that and meet you more than half way ...
[View All]
Nihil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-03-09 05:18 AM
Response to Original message |
| 3. I'd support that and meet you more than half way ... |
|
Get the 14 core wedges and I'd be happy to drop the 1/2 wedge of nuclear.
If you get the geothermal, soils/biochar "additional wedges" then I'd
go along with the 1/2 wedge of biofuels to keep the 1/2 wedge of next
generation (presumably cleaner/more acceptable) nuclear.
Please don't try for a wedge of coal though and put the money wasted
on "CCS" con-tricks to better use in one of the other wedges instead.
Mind you, this is me in optimistic mood and thinking that 350-450ppm
stabilisation is achievable rather than just waffle to cover up the
ongoing situation while maximising the profits of polluters.
:hi:
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread