You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: I think 90% is a bit extreme. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I think 90% is a bit extreme.
I've just completed a methodical, though necessarily speculative, projection of global energy supplies, http://www.paulchefurka.ca/WEAP2/WEAP2.html">World Energy to 2050. I conclude that the we'll lose 30% of our total energy by then. The majority of that loss will be oil and natural gas, which combined may decline by 75% or a bit more. Given the added contributions of solar and wind, and the continued performance of coal, hydro and nuclear power, overall energy supplies will decline by only about 30%. Unfortunately, that 30% robs us of most of the transportation and heating fuels we use today.



Paul Chefurka

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC