Reply #22: I don't know why I'm bothering...

[w13rd0]

...how long has it been since this "story" broke? Even with Dean's reputation for rapid response, that's a little quick to be raising hell because you aren't getting a mea culpa, isn't it?

Furthermore, I'm reviewing the ads in question. What the hell? Dennis is hacked off because Dean didn't parenthetically exclude him by saying "some of my opponents for the nomination say (except Dennis Kucinich, and I should mention that so he doesn't try jumping all down my throat at the next debate)"... So just which pieces of shit are you willing to vote for? I mean hell, let's be forthright about it. Who running for the nomination HASN'T distorted something or changed their mind about an issue important to the "democratic base"? What, can't think of anyone? Wait, I can. I can think of ONE candidate that hasn't, and most people don't think she stands much of a chance.

I'll grant this, even as a Dean supporter. Dennis Kucinich is the only ANTI-WAR candidate running for the Democratic nomination. No doubt about it. And that's fine...there, I said it. You gonna be ok now? Or are you gonna go vote for Bush?