You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #83: We would be home by now, as there are no weapons and that's [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #75
83. We would be home by now, as there are no weapons and that's
Edited on Mon Dec-01-03 06:18 PM by mzmolly
painfully clear. We would not have overthrown Saddam Hussein. We would have had to allow inspections to continue etc...

I am aware of the vastly different course this country would be on if B/L had passed, and your candidate *the foreign policy expert* should be too.

Your own candidate preferred B/L but didn't stick to his guns. Why did Kerry prefer it to the rez that passed? Why did Bush say it tied his hands?

I think you know why, your spinning for John Sandnsea. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC