You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #67: Youn supported Nader [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
Nicholas_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #56
67. Youn supported Nader
Edited on Wed Aug-13-03 06:02 PM by Nicholas_J
And now switch to that Enviro destructicon Dean...

Now that is amusing.


Try checking under the name "Lucien Breton" and the "Vermont Egg Factory: for a tiny glimpse of Deans destruction of the environment.

Or try:


Re: Greater Burlington Industrial Corp. and Husky Injection Molding Systems, Inc.,
#4C1007-1-EB, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, & Order (June 25, 1998)

VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD
10 V.S.A.  6001-6092

Re: Greater Burlington Industrial Corp. and
Husky Injection Molding Systems, Inc.,
Land Use Permit Application #4C1007-1-EB
Docket #677

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER

This appeal concerns review of a master plan for a project known
as the Husky Campus, a 4 million square foot industrial project to
be constructed over a period of 20 years on approximately 700
acres in Milton, Vermont ("Project"). As explained in more detail
below, the Vermont Environmental Board ("Board") concludes that
the Project complies with 10 V.S.A.  6086(a)(8) ("Criterion 8").

I. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

On March 20, 1997, Greater Burlington Industrial Corp. ("GBIC"),
Husky Injection Molding Systems, Inc. ("Husky"), Joseph and
Barbara Rowe and the Joseph P. and Barbara L. Revocable Trust,
Sherrol Ward and Albee Westover, John A. Russel, Jane Fitzgerald,
Betty McLanel, Nancy Bullis, Robert and Clarice Lamphere, and
Erwin and Lee H. Devino (collectively the "Applicants") filed an
application with the District #4 Environmental Commission
("District Commission") seeking partial approval of the Project
under 10 V.S.A.  6001-6092 ("Act 250").

On May 29, 1997, the District Commission issued Partial Findings
of Fact and Conclusions of Law regarding the Application ("May
1997 Decision"). On June 19, 1997, in response to a Motion to
Alter filed by GBIC and Husky, the District Commission issued
Supplemental Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law ("June 1997
Decision"). The May 1997 Decision and the June 1997 Decision are
referred to collectively herein as the "Partial Decision."

http://www.state.vt.us/envboard/decisions/eb/1998/4c1007-1-dec.txt

Dean arranged for all kinds of rezoning and spending of tons of taxpayer money to build a bridge for this Canadian company to bring its business in to pollute Vermont.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC