Reply #9: I think you are trying to use pet doctrine.

[RandomThoughts]

And possibly concepts of superiority.

But mostly that you have a huge logic flaw.

If you cared about what you call a dog, showing you don't, then how could that person not having beer and travel money be worse then not having it after giving it away, because you don't think what you call a dog should self rule his or her beer and travel money.

But your lack of care and respect removes your ability to make that decision, and actually you can't make that decision anyways, and only you thinking you do, that is what creates your superiority complex.


You will probably lock the dog in the house and it will eat your dead carcass when you die. :shrug: It is how you show it to be. At least it learned from you, guess that is something.




On a side note, there is a concept of trying to keep a person from sharing beer and travel money with those you might think superior to, but if you were superior, or even close, you would understand that no harm can come from sharing beer and travel money, even if to a thief. And if you knew that, even your superiority complex would not stop you from thinking in better concepts of giving, not trying to take by not giving, what is not yours that you took anyways.


Blinded by the Light by Manfred Mann's Earth Band
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eg8cDmi7-U8