You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #254: Well, "sad" doesn't necessarily mean "bad" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #251
254. Well, "sad" doesn't necessarily mean "bad"
For instance, nobody says Shakespeare was a bad writer because Romeo and Juliette had a sad ending.

In any event, the death of Robert in FWTBT isn't supposed to be sad. Certainly it is sad for the "little rabbit", but as far as Robert is concerned, he is dying for something worth dying for and he embraces his fate. Furthermore, he gets to extract vengence on the Lieutenant who beheaded El Sordo, so one could say that the conclusion of the book is one of poetic justice, not tragedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC