I'll offer the counterpoint. Your post basically insinuated that a woman who stays at home with the kids isn't contributing to the household in any way financially. That the man should be able to recoup some of those losses from having to be the sole bread winner. The economic benefits to the man of having someone stay at home free of charge and take care of the kids are enormous. No divorce settlement can ever come close to repaying that. I was deeply offended by that highly sexist notion, so I responded sarcastically. So I guess I wasn't clear.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
