You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #45: Don't blame LM for your imprecise writing [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. Don't blame LM for your imprecise writing
Edited on Sun Apr-25-10 12:57 AM by Orrex
For those of us who like a voluptuous women versus the waifs who look as if they would crack in half if confronted with a big comfy loving hug, this is an insult.

Guess who is crying out the loudest, ABC and Fox.

Disney who believes all girls should look like the interchangeable heroine with girls jammed into the minuscule waif waist and Fox, whose news network celebrates the thin railed women, ala Annie got her gun.

Well, to that I say bring on the real women, the women who care more about live than how they look to some fashion designer who must be held captive in Milan, Paris and New York in some kind of kiddie porn version of hell...

The "high" fashion world is the snarkiest snarkers of all, convincing everyone who doesn't conform to their size -1 perception of women is just not worth even their contempt...

I say bring on the real women and fuck your opinions of how a woman should look...


Well, let's see.

You made a point of specifically praising "voluptuous women," contrasting them with "the waifs," the "girls jammed into minuscule waif waist," and "the thin railed women," all of whom you attacked.

You then moved immediately to "bring on the real women." The only reasonable inference, based on what you wrote, is that "voluptuous women" are "real women," while thin women are not.

If you truly meant to refer to all women who don't obsessively cling to a misguided and anorexic ideal of beauty, then you should have stated this. Instead, you praised full-figured women, attacked slender women, and then complained when people called you on it.


What you're attempting now is known in political circles as a "clarification" of your earlier remarks.


Here's how you clarify your position: restate that position unambiguously and acknowledge that it was your imprecise writing that caused people to misconstrue your intent. Don't blame the reader for inferring something that you claim not to have implied; doing so only makes you look like you're trying to pin your imprecision on somebody else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC