You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: No, not in the least [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. No, not in the least
Edited on Wed Dec-28-05 12:46 AM by Nevernose
I don't think it makes me a bad person, or even sexist, to say that I have notions of masculine and feminine. Some of that's certainly cultural (e.g., out culture now says that anorexics with boob jobs are the ideal in feminine beauty, and men must have enormus muscles and 0% body fat, and it's hard to completely ignore the world in which we live), but I think a large part of that's biological. No matter what the programming is, it's only as good as the hardware, and we are, essentially, highly evolved apes.

Besides, really big muscles are rather grotesque on either sex...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC