You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #18: No, not originally. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. No, not originally.
When Mann came into English, there were three words used to desribe people. Mann was the equivalent of Human, Wer was the equivalent of Male Human, and Wif was the equivalent of female human. Up until very recently, Man was the general reference word for all of humanity. We need to push that meaning back out, rather than rework the rest of the language to avoid it.

Wer is completly dead to the language, so it can't be brought back, but "male", "guy" or any number of other words could suffice. (Wif, the old english word for female, survives today in the word Wife).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC