You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU.
Reply #3: Ummm...
[View All]
punpirate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-04 07:23 AM
Response to Original message |
|
... I think she should have been given the opportunity to verify if it was a weapon, or not. A supervisor should be called out to act as a demonstration model and she should have been given the opportunity to whop him or her up side the chops with the "concealed weapon". If the person whopped didn't fall down in pants-pissing spasms, then it wasn't a weapon.
Maybe then, the supervisors wouldn't be quite so twitchy about "concealed weapons."
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.