You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #73: That is a very nice hypothesis, and I'm familiar with it [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
SOteric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #59
73. That is a very nice hypothesis, and I'm familiar with it
But really, I'm sure you're bright enough to realise that isn't anything close to "proof there is no god."

All that it proves is that it's possible to stimulate a portion of the brain that causes an individual to believe they're in the presence of a supreme being.

In no way does that absolutely preclude the possibility of an actual supreme being. I simply forms yet another good, but unproven hypothesis on how the idea of a God has sprung up in so many places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC