Reply #4: Thank You!

[in_cog_ni_to]

Another eye opener.


Here's that doggone Roe v. Wade issue again...

Kucinich....

Roe v. Wade Consistently pro-life until early 2002 (source: Clevelandrighttolife.com); now the only candidate pledging to make Roe v. Wade a litmus test for federal judges
(source: Kucinich.us)

Dean.....

Pro-choice (source: DeanforAmerica.com), but refuses to set litmus tests, demurring that his nominees will have "outstanding legal credentials" (source: DeanforAmerica.com) and otherwise implying -- while refusing to say, for some reason -- that he would appoint pro-choice judges (source: DeanforAmerica.com)


Why does he refuse to state that he WOULD appoint pro-choice judges? Women, BEWARE!!! JMCPO