You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #80: rumguy [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-03 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #68
80. rumguy
"So suck on that"

Yes, that is very constructive. Do you actually convince anyone of anything with stupid comments like that?

"The national debt is something that worries everyone, even people over in freepville."

Is that right? Perhaps it worries them, but it sure doesn't usually affect how they vote. Mondale and Dukakis ran on the deficit and it got them nowhere. There are a lot of issues that people say they "worry" about, but what matters in winning general elections are finding the issues that actually cause people to vote one way or the other.

"We must emphasize the areas of the economy that ARE NOT improving or are getting worse."

That is wonderful, every opposition party throughout American history does that. Not exactly a wonderful new suggestion. I am with you on hightlighting where the economy is not doing well and offering constructive solutions that attract votes, but to deny that the economy is turning around is just plain foolish.

Rather than try to pick at what parts of the economy are not doing well, which is always a tough sell when the overall economy is improving - we would be better off chosing a few big exciting issues and pounding them home.

"And the QUALITY of the jobs being created is an important thing."

This was also an issue in the eighties and it just flat didn't work for the Democratic Party, and I suspect it will work no better now. If the overall economy is improving, and the majority of people feel reasonably secure - we just won't get anywhere complaining about the QUALITY of the new jobs.

"It's amazing how many people in this country, hard working people, DON'T HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE, cuz their jobs offer no benefits."

Healthcare is a HUGE issue which the Democratic Party has no excuse for not having capitalized on. In my opinion, our candidate(s) should talk about broad themes here and not get mired in details. The talking points should focus on the big issue and not the messy specifics - that we can save for when a Democrat is safely in the White House.

Imajika
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC