Continuing the conversation from the NYPOST Editorial locked thread

[Bertrand]

*Note: this isnt a continuation of a flamewar, but an extention of a seperate conversation within that thread.

in response to my post:

W13rd0

Im sorry if ive offended you, but coming from someone who holds Dean as a good #2 Choice along with Kerry for the Dem nom, ive been upset lately with his attacks on others. He has been running a negative campaign lately, and im bothered by it.

w13rd0 wrote:

No, he hasn't...

...check his Capitol Report CNBC appearance. Once again, Dean has taken the comments of his supporters into account and done a great job of being responsive to them. Most of the candidates are doing their fair share of attacking, in one manner or another, if that is what one wants to call it. Attacking, doing politics, whatever. Everyone is a little ruffled under the collar I'm sure, I just wish people thought things through a little more before they hit the post button...

You must acknowledge his recent unsolicited offensive against Clark where he said that "Clark was a republican until 25 days ago" and from The NYTimes article where he prefaced his negativite comments about Clark by saying "General Clark has not attacked me and I'm not going to start by attacking him" These types of comments show that he is campaigning by trying to tear down another candidate to boost his campaign, and i dont like it. Im sorry if that offends you but that doesnt change my opinion. I have no problem with him having policy clashes, but when he attacks the character of others he not only isnt above reproach, he actually encourages it.