140. It is relevant as far as the user is concerned
He was only allowed to vote ONCE in the normal deletion poll and this person didn't and sneaked a second vote into there. So it is relevant for the value of the contributions of the user. What is the value of an entry by a person who is willing to commit voter fraud for their pet entry. But maybe it isn't about voting. It seems like this is the SECOND time by your quote above and that makes it even sadder, because that means that there is a history of disrupting sites to proof a POV.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
