You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #132: You're right. It's not. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #129
132. You're right. It's not.
Edited on Mon Oct-24-05 05:47 PM by impeachdubya
But it implies that the Universe may be a shitload weirder than we've been led to believe. Much of quantum physics is the same, if you look into it. It's fascinating stuff. The implications of the double slit experiment, which tie into bell's theorem, are particularly weird.

As far as the link, apparently trying to post a link with an apostrophe causes the screwup with the foward slash. That certainly aint my fault! As far as making up bell's theorem, you did not say that- that is correct- but you did claim Wikipedia was a suspect source before you had a problem with the link, and the implication I took from it was that whatever material I was referencing was suspect as well. I find Wikipedia pretty good for all purpose, general information gathering, but it's not too hard to find other material on Bell's theorem.

And lastly, nowhere in any of my posts did I ever express an interest in "proving" psychic ability. In fact, I pretty much said that the definition of a pointless activity was trying to convince someone, one way or the other. What I took issue with was your taking a twenty word post as a basis for which to inform me that whatever 'weird shit' I might be talking about having experienced or seen during my time on this planet was attributable (my opinion notwithstanding) to "coincidence". I thought that was a little presumptuous, especially since all I was really exhorting the previous poster to do was to keep an open mind. Maybe that's bad advice, I don't know.

But I DO happen to know as well as I know that the sun is shining, that certain things I've experienced run far deeper than mere 'coincidence'. But I don't have that Jehovah's Witness/Pope/Imam/CSICOP personality trait where I need to 'convince' other people of things, or give a flyin' fig what they happen to believe-- so long as they don't try to peddle it, for instance, in my kids' science classes. (And, yes, I would include claims of psychic ability in that)

But I'm sure there are things I've experienced which, if I were to relate them to certain people, their response would be "bullshit". Why bother? Your path is not mine, and I certainly don't require external validation to confirm the meaning of my own personal experiences. I know what I know, and that's a good thing, because I know where to find the one wiser than all the Buddhas and Sages. He's right there when I close the medicine cabinet in the bathroom.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC