You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: Novak is slicing and dicing his own quote with Harlow's [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. Novak is slicing and dicing his own quote with Harlow's
From the above theconservativevoice.com article:

What he did say was, as I reported in a previous column, "she probably never again would be given a foreign assignment but that exposure of her name might cause 'difficulties.'"

Notice that "difficulties" is the only word in double quotation marks? And the immediate antecedent to the entire quote is "...as I reported in a previous column...." But that segment of the sentence is prefaced by "What he did say was...."

Novak is merely quoting his own Washington Post article of October 1, 2003 (see below), with the exception of the word "difficulties." Is it his intention to make the reader think the entire quote is from Harlow? In any case, the fact is that we don't know what Harlow really said, immediately before he used the word "difficulties."

From the Post article:

At the CIA, the official designated to talk to me denied that Wilson's wife had inspired his selection but said she was delegated to request her husband's help. The CIA official asked me not to use her name, saying that she probably never again would be given a foreign assignment but that exposure of her name might cause "difficulties" if she were to travel abroad. He never suggested to me that Wilson's wife or anybody else would be endangered. If he had, I would not have used her name. I used it in the sixth paragraph of my column because it looked like the missing explanation of an otherwise incredible choice by the CIA for its mission.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A30022-2003Oct1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC