You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #102: Yes suburban architecture is crappy because ... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #78
102. Yes suburban architecture is crappy because ...
Edited on Tue Jan-11-05 03:45 PM by HamdenRice
it is so profoundly fake. Let's look at even the modest pic that Walt Starr posted that he says he may go for.

By saying that it is fake, I don't just mean that it is faking at being something it is not. In this case, it is obviously faking at being English tudor, even though that period ended 300 years ago.

More importantly, it is more profoundly fake because the form tells us almost nothing about its function. Whether you look at the horrible mcmansion or the Walt Starr house, you can ask a lot of questions: why are there so many pitched roofs, enclosing gables, instead of just one? These gables within gables are not actually walls. What purpose do they serve? In the macmansion, You are right, they look like pop-ups -- like someone was trying to cram as many useless gables in as little space as possible -- just like useless advertising. Why are they there? Is it just to add cost and "bangles" to please an unsophisticated buyer?

Look at the Starr house. Why does it have shutters that don't close? Why verticle and horizontal beams inlaid in stucco? Obviously it is a "quote" of some simulacrum of some simalacrum of some simulacrum of some distant memory of tudor; but why would an architect put in on such and house and why would a buyer want it? In tudor architecure these beams were supporting, load bearing beams. Here they are just decoration, and ironic quotes, the architecht "laughing" at the owner.

<edited>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC