You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #20: well [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. well
we're having two discussions here.

One is whether is it is right and reasonable for people to own very destructive weapons. I think we agree on the answer to that.

The second one, and more strictly related to your original question, is DOES the 2nd Amendment, in fact, protect our right to bear arms against the government? I don't think the 2nd Amendment states that, and in fact, I think the mention of a well-regulated militia argues AGAINST that opinion.

However, IF the amendment does exist to allow us to use arms against the government, then I can find no logical reason why the government alone should get the good stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC