Reply #114: No Proof, no facts.

[kohodog]

presented by Bond. All hearsay.

Wilson rebuts by saying that the Senate Intell, US Intell said soon after Wilson's OpEd that they Brit Intell was weak and shouldn't have been referenced.

Bond: Wilson's report didn't change any analysists' opinions, in fact it enhanced it.

BS.

Wilson's rebuttal was great...explained that the meeting in question didn't mention yellow cake.

Bond "They had a meeting and the PM assumed that it would be about yellowcake" So it must have been he implied. Therefore Wilson owes the admin an appology.

Wilson: Senior CIA officials didn't think there was enough evidence for it to be credible."

Bond "All the PResident had to go on was the information given to him." Guess he's off the hook!!!

OK so Bond says : (the real problem) is that Bush is being called a liar. HaHaHa

Now he refutes the "she recommended him" bs. He seemed to stert to go to the issue being Novak outing Plame, but the segment ended...

But ultimately they say nothing and only cause people who aren't following it to think that there are two sides and maybe it's not a big deal.

But why would they be seeking yellow cake if they han no way to extract weapon's grade Uranium? The whole thing may have seemed plausible when Condi and Cheney were warning of imminent mushroom clouds, but in the context of what we know now it is obvious that they had no use for it. (I must say, having done the Duck and Hide in grade school, the mushroom cloud stuff gave me some pause).

But that's what they do...lie and create fear to distract and manipulate. Those of us who see thruogh it must refute them and speak up.

I'm not a transcriber so I hope this is fairly accurate.