You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #31: NY Times and WaPo have vested interest in perpetuating [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
chaumont58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
31. NY Times and WaPo have vested interest in perpetuating
lie about Whitewater. Howell Raines had to resign over Jason Blair, but Jeff Gerth still works for NYT. Len Downie, to this day, still believes some guilt on the part of one or both Clinton with regard to Whitewater. I used to send email regarding his pursuit of Bill Clinton and his lack of progress. I only got one reply. He was sure that when the final report by the OIC came out, there would be indictments over Whitewater. Needless to say, his disappointment continued. Inside the beltway is a strange place. Up is down, black is white, the truth doesn't matter, only appearance. A smirking chimp is SELECTED to be President, and he is hailed to be a combination of Lincoln, FDR, Ghandi, and now, even ole Raygun.
The NY Times and the WaPo are not liberal. There aren't many liberals left. Maybe part of the Nation, certainly nothing on the staff of The New Republic. On cable TV news shows, who would truly be considered liberal? Certainly not that cess pool, the Capitol Gang.
When you look at the control the Republicans have, their incompetance becomes truly amazing. They control the executive branch, the legislative branch, the judicial branch, and the press corps is made of outright wingnuts, or fellow travelors. In spite of all this control, John Kerry is even leading is some national polls. Kerry is not what anyone is going to call charismatic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC