|
Edited on Wed Dec-10-03 11:36 PM by slinkerwink
This is the complete text that was cherry-picked to make Dean sound like he lied about being against the Iraq war. I'll highlight the pertinent statements in bold.
(BOB SCHIEFFER),You have said at this point that the president has not yet made the case for war, and that nothing so far has justified a unilateral strike into Iraq.
But Iraq now says, over the weekend, that it will not accept tougher rules for inspection. Doesn't that make the case now for the administration?
GOV. HOWARD DEAN, D-VT: Not quite yet. There's no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat to the United States and to our allies. The question is, is he an immediate threat? The president has not yet made the case for that.
I think it may very well be, particularly with the news that we've had over the weekend; that we are going to end up in Iraq. But I think it's got to be gone about in a very different way. It really is important to involve our allies, to bring other people into the coalition, to get a decent resolution out of the U.N. Security Council.
And if Saddam persists in thumbing his nose at the inspectors, we are clearly going to have to do something about it. But I'm not convinced yet and the president has not yet made the case, nor has he ever said, this is an immediate threat.
In fact, the only intelligence that has been put out there is the British intelligence report, which says he is a threat but not an immediate one. *********************************************
Now here is the COMPLETE answer to the first question you cited:
GLORIA BORGER, U.S. News & World Report: Governor, what exactly does the president then have to prove to you?
DEAN: I don't think he really has to prove anything. I think that most Americans, including myself, will take the president's word for it. But the president has never said that Saddam has the capability of striking the United States with atomic or biological weapons any time in the immediate future.
My question is not that we may not have to go into Iraq. We may very well have to go into Iraq. What is the rush? Why can't we take the time to get our allies on board? Why do we have to do everything in a unilateral way?
It's not good for the future of the foreign policy of this country to be the bully on the block and tell people we're going to do what we want to do.
We clearly have to defend the United States, and if we must do so unilaterally we will. But I think the time now is for getting the cooperation of the Security Council and our allies.
**************************************
Below is both the question prior to the last question you cited along with the following question you did cite and once again, the COMPLETE answer:
SCHIEFFER: Well, Governor, what, in your mind, would justify a strike on Iraq?
DEAN: Well, first of all, a strike may be justified. What he's got to say, what the president has got to say is that Saddam has atomic or biological weapons and has the means to deliver them to ourselves and our allies. That case -- he has never said that, to my knowledge, nor have any of his surrogates.
SCHIEFFER: Well, does he have to have the means to deliver them to us? Or what if he had the means to give them to another terrorist group who could bring them into this country in a suitcase?
DEAN: Well, that's correct, that would certainly be grounds for us to intervene, and if we had so unilaterally, we could do that.
But, Bob, my problem is not whether we're going to end up in Iraq or not.
Saddam Hussein appears to be doing everything he can to make sure we do go into Iraq. My problem is, it is important to bring in our allies.
Foreign policy in this country is dependent on us working with other countries. And I think the president got off on the wrong foot when he was simply talking about "Let's go in there, we don't care what anybody else thinks, we're going to do it."
I think things have improved in the last couple of weeks, as he's turned to the United Nations. We should have done that in the first place. And we need to continue, as his father did, to build an international coalition to go after Saddam and make sure he does not have those weapons of mass destruction.
|