You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #19: The feat was clearly impossible using the rifle that the WC claimed... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-03 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. The feat was clearly impossible using the rifle that the WC claimed...
...was the murder weapon. Several facts eliminate the Mannlicher-Carcano from being the JFK murder weapon:

1) The bolt-action on the Mannlicher-Carcano was so tight that it tended to stick...this slowed down the firing process between shots.

2) The trigger when squeezed produced a normal trigger-pull until it unpredictably became a hair trigger at the last possible second...this undoubtedly had an effect on the accuracy of the weapon as it was prone to fire when the shooter was not yet ready.

3) The scope on the rifle as it was initially found could not be used for its intended purpose because it was loose and not properly aligned.

4) Additionally, the FBI weapons experts refused to test-fire the rifle until repairs were made to the weapon.

5) The WC used marksmen that test-fired at stationary targets and used a 30-foot tower instead of the 60 feet necessary to simulate the height of the sniper's nest.

6) The 1967 CBS News tests, conducted under more accurate conditions, still resulted in only four of the eleven marksmen being able to score two hits out of three. See #7 below.

7) Oswald was at best a mediocre shot. He qualified at the lowest possible level of marksmanship on the USMC rifle range.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC