You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #102: Imminent danger is the rule.
[View All]
ddeclue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-22-05 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
| 102. Imminent danger is the rule. |
|
Imminent means immediate military force would be applied against the United States.
Outside of that he must seek a declaration of war from Congress.
People's phone conversations do not constitute an immediate military threat. The constitute free speech.
The President MUST get a warrant to listen in that's the law. By your standards what keeps the President from declaring his political opponents as a "military threat" so he can listen in?
Doug D.
Orlando, FL
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread