You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #1: That's interesting
[View All]
jobycom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 03:37 PM
Response to Original message |
|
She's not on the Armed Services Committee. Why would she do this? I'm not complaining, it sounds like well-supported legislation from the groups who have endorsed it. But is this some move to win military support for a possible national bid, or is military support crucial to her in California, or is this just an issue she's personally involved in (The first two don't preclude the sincerity of the last)?
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread