In split-second decisions, you don't have the time to get a sufficient amount of answers and had no choice but to make a guess within that split-second?
Do you take a risk he's comparatively harmless?
Do you take a risk he's comparatively harmless and believe the rest of the passangers won't freak out if you continue to let him run amok?
Do you take a risk that he COULD be a danger?
We're still human. And this isn't a game of Chess. Real lives are at stake. MANY lives.
Whatever happened to "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few"? Even in cases requiring decisions we may not want to face?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
