Reply #34: Good post Bronx.. I am like you

[walldude]

I have been flamed on a previous thread because I had the nerve to state that I didn't know enough about the case to make an honest, sound argument.(and I'm not going to sit here for a day reading everything I would need to, it just doesn't matter that much to me) I am against the death penalty anyway but apparently that doesn't matter in this debate :eyes: What happens to this guy has no bearing on me whatsoever. I can understand both sides of the issue. You have pro-tookie people saying he didn't get a fair trial, he may be innocent, the prosecutor was biased, blah, blah. Uh the guy is co-founder of the Crips. You want to tell me again how "innocent" he is. :eyes: Then you have the fry-tookie folks who think there is no rehabilitation for him. Uh, he is working to keep kids from making the same mistakes he did. There are two sides and both have sound arguments. I am done with the "tookie" debate, let the chips fall where they may.